Science Highlights


Interested in highlighting a recent publication?

Nominate a recent publication using this form.

Please feel free to share this with anyone who might be interested.


Science Highlight - April 2026

In-season crop progress in unsurveyed regions using networks trained on synthetic data
Worrall and Judge (2026) 

How can we monitor crop development in regions where no ground observations exist?

Many remote sensing approaches for crop progress rely on survey data, limiting their use in data-sparse regions. As a result, these approaches have limited transferability across regions with different climates and management practices.

Worrall and Judge (2026) address this problem by developing a framework that combines satellite observations with synthetic crop progress data to enable in-season monitoring in unsurveyed regions. The study links weather generators, crop growth models (DSSAT), and radiative transfer models to simulate realistic crop development and associated reflectance signals. A bi-directional LSTM neural network is then trained using combinations of real survey data from the U.S. Midwest and synthetic data generated for Argentina, which serves as a proxy “unsurveyed” region.

Their findings show that:

  • Including synthetic data during training improves crop progress estimation in unsurveyed regions, increasing overall performance by ~8.7% compared to using surveyed data alone.
  • Performance gains are strongest in regions with more complex cropping systems, such as dual planting seasons, where synthetic data helps the model capture bimodal crop development patterns.
  • Combining synthetic and real data also reduces sensitivity to noise in satellite NDVI time series, improving robustness of in-season estimates.

Overall, this study demonstrates that physically consistent synthetic data can help overcome the lack of ground observations, enabling remote sensing-based crop progress estimation in previously inaccessible regions. This approach opens new opportunities for monitoring agricultural risk and crop development globally, particularly in data-limited environments.

Co-authors: George Worrall and Jasmeet Judge


Past Science Highlights

  • March, 2026: Zhao et al. (2026). Satellite microwave radiometry at L-Band for monitoring Earth’s essential climate variables: from fundamental physics to sixteen years of global climate observations and beyond. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2026.3665669
  • February, 2026: Hirschi et al. (2025). Potential of long-term satellite observations and reanalysis products for characterising soil drying: trends and drought events. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 29(2), 397–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-397-2025
  • October, 2025: Maina and Kumar (2025). Global patterns of rain-on-snow and its impacts on runoff from past to future projections. Nature Communications, 16, 4731, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59855-3
  • August, 2025: Chandanpurkar et al. (2025). Unprecedented continental drying, shrinking freshwater availability, and increasing land contributions to sea level rise. Science Advances, 11(30), eadx0298, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx0298
  • July, 2025: Li et al. (2025). Global dominance of seasonality in shaping lake-surface-extent dynamics. Nature, 642, 361–368, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09046-3
  • June, 2025: Abdelmohsen et al. (2025). Declining freshwater availability in the Colorado River Basin threatens sustainability of its critical groundwater supplies. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(10), e2025GL115593, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL115593
  • May, 2025: Román et al. (2024). Continuity between NASA MODIS Collection 6.1 and VIIRS Collection 2 land products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 302, 113963, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113963 
  • April, 2025: Felton et al. (2025). Global estimates of the storage and transit time of water through vegetation. Nature Water, 3, 59–69https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00365-9 
  • March, 2025: Ahmad et al. (2025). Challenges in Unifying Physically Based and Machine Learning Simulations. Geophysical Research Letters, 52(4), e2024GL112893, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112893 
  • February, 2025: Vinogradova et al. (2025). A new look at Earth’s water and energy with SWOT. Nature Water, 3, 27–37https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00372-w
  • January, 2025: Crow and Feldman (2025). Vegetation signal crosstalk present in official SMAP surface soil moisture retrievals. Remote Sensing of Environment, 316, 114466, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.114466
  • October, 2024: Manh-Hung et al. (2024). On the Use of SMAP Soil Moisture for Forecasting NDVI Over CONUS Cropland Regions. Geophysial Research Letters, 51(20), e2024GL111187, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111187